Criminal Gangs and Getaway Cars

An Argument Against Private Covid Tyranny

You get an A+ if you recognize the state as a criminal gang.

But is this all just a philosophical abstraction that bears no truth outside of the fictional world?

If a bank robber has a getaway driver, and they get caught, the getaway driver is complicit and without an excuse.

Enter the Covid Regime.

The Criminal Gang Government relies on the strength, power, and wealth of private entities to serve out their commands. They are complicit in aiding the Criminal Covid Regime. They thieve your liberty to buy and sell all the same, only without cuffing you up for non-compliance. They may not hold the gun to your head, but they are the getaway car.

Public-private partnerships operate on coercion for profit. Just as you can find violence and coercion without exception in the state alone.

It is commonly argued that corporations possess an absolute right to private property, and therefore, retain an absolute right to mandate conditions upon their workers at the drop of a hat.

Given that corporations are in effect creations of the state, they are artificial entities. Many of them receive corporate welfare and benefit from their connections with the state. Ergo, they are recipients of stolen wealth and privileged status. They cannot possess rights in the absolute sense without becoming tyrannical power centers.

At the very least, all of this gives corporations a lesser claim on property than an individual contracting to sell his labor without a condition to get jabbed. But by the employer's "social contract," that rule was added overnight - after the fact. The employee doesn't live off the state, but off the labor he sells.

An employee who refuses the jab is exercising his property right to bodily autonomy, a most natural right. This is to be trumped by a state-created artificial entity? If so, you ultimately have no rights.

Contractual terms matter, as it is the relationship with an employer that you agree to. You aren't there to shop. You wouldn't be there without both a need and stated conditions that you find tolerable. Corporate-owned property itself doesn't trump this, especially when there is no exclusive owner, as there is with a residential home.

These are entirely different animals.